It argues from the record — or refuses to write the letter
The generator drafts from what the chart actually says, cites the payer's own coverage policy, and grades its own draft before you file.
A letter a reviewer takes seriously, or none at all
Grounded in the payer's own coverage policy and graded before you file — and when the record cannot support an appeal, you find out before spending the one you get.
A letter that invents support loses twice
It fails, and it tells the reviewer your documentation cannot be trusted. Asked to appeal from a thin record, this withholds the letter instead.
Citations a reviewer will accept
Grounded in the CMS articles and NCDs that govern the code — quoted, with the document number — not a general argument about medical necessity.
It tells you what is still wrong with it
Unfilled placeholders, missing required elements, and how thin the precedent is. You file knowing the weaknesses, or you fix them first.
Try it on your own words
Appeal a denial from a record you paste. Leave it empty to run the sample case. Use made-up details — this is a public page, so do not paste real patient information.
What the engine returned
cached run · 82.3s — press Run this engine for your own text